Test video of an early prototype:
Top = The Gyrowalker ON. Bottom = The Gyrowalker OFF.
Play it several times so that you can see the difference in the speed of falling.
The GyroWalker is being designed for any person with imbalance who has sufficient grip strength to lift and move a walker. With falls, people tend to reach out and grab onto anything stable nearby. The GyroWalker is able to provide considerable stabilizing gyroscopic force. Most people who are able to use a regular walker may be able to use The GyroWalker.
Yes. Generally, walkers with feet tend to be more stable than walkers with wheels (rollators). The most popular version of walkers includes a set of wheels on the front and feet at the rear.
It does both. When first tilted, the electric motor system activates, and a stabilizing 'reaction wheel effect' force is nearly instantly available to counteract tilt (in any direction) to prevent a fall. Secondly, if the fall continues, a stabilizing gyroscopic force takes over as the flywheels come up to speed, thereby slowing the fall. All of this happens very quickly (in less than 1/2 second).
The initial 'reaction wheel effect' force for our present prototype is about 10 pounds of force at the handles. This helps to 'nudge' a person to prevent a fall. If the fall continues, a stabilizing gyroscopic force of more than 50 pounds becomes available to help slow the fall. Wouldn't you like to have more than 50 pounds of force help hold you up and/or slow your fall?
No, of course not, but our goal is to provide a product that reduces risks of falling.
It is being designed to come in two sizes (large and small), and likely additional customized options in the future.
It does not fold up, but it is being designed to be 'collapsible' or 'nesting' to save space with transportation and storage.
It is still under design, but the goal weight is less than 25 pounds. Interestingly, much of the structure, including the rail system, may be 3-D printed from light weight but strong materials. We are in the process of making custom-designed electric motors in which the electric motor itself (the magnetic rotor) will provide angular momentum and negate the need for actual flywheels--thereby further lessening overall weight.
A standard wall outlet (110V in the U.S.) by extension cord. Since most of the time, it works like any other walker and since it only activates in response to sufficient tilt, depending upon use, it may need to be recharged only very infrequently.
Not yet. It is still in the prototype stage, but we are excited about our proof-of-concept prototype! A production-ready prototype will then need to have FDA approval before sales may begin.
Although the idea of gyroscopic stabilization is old, for example, the first use of gyroscopic stabilization for a ship was in 1917, the requisite lightweight components required to make a useful, gyroscopically stabilized walker have only recently been widely available. Gyroscopic devices tend to maintain their orientation, making them useful in many applications from the large scale (eg. ship anti-roll devices weighing many tons) to the small scale (eg. tiny gyroscopic sensors). Vertical stabilization requires resisting tilt in two directions: front to back and side to side. Walking aid devices need to be relatively light weight for an individual user to lift, turn, and move.
A prior attempt at producing a gyroscopically stabilized walking cane would produce only a small stabilizing force, and to our knowledge, is not commercially available. Other devices, including wearable backpack-like gyroscopically stabilized devices, seem unfeasible due to potential weight and size, difficulty putting on and off, and furthermore, would likely produce very little stabilizing force. There are numerous fall-detection sensory devices with small gyroscopes, but these devices do not make use of direct gyroscopic torque for stabilization.
After seeking input from consultants including a physicist, physical therapist, medical device safety specialist, physicians, and most importantly, patients with imbalance, our device design has evolved. After countless additional hours of work and contemplation, we have iterated multiple prototypes. We now have a walking aid prototype device that uses direct gyroscopic stabilization to resist tilt and falls in more than one direction. Both of a user’s hands are utilized, rather than a cane or wearable device. The user stands at the ideal location for stability.
The device activates in response to tilt. Initially, reaction wheel effect force is utilized to help slow the fall. We know of no prior attempts at making a walker stabilized by reaction wheel effect or gyroscopic effect. Check out videos on youtube of other devices including a cube device (no affiliation with USAGYROMOBILITY, INC.) stabilized by reaction wheel effect.
As the flywheels quickly spin up to speed (in less than 1/2 second), reaction wheel effect force lessens, and gyroscopic stabilizing force takes over. The cool thing about reaction wheel effect is that it is maximal at flywheel startup, and then reaction wheel effect wanes as the flywheels build up speed (angular momentum). This compliments, very well, with gyroscopic stabilization, which begins at zero and then builds as flywheel speed increases. Reaction wheel effect forces (a.k.a. motor torque) can be vectored (aimed) in the ideal direction to counteract the direction of fall. This is because each motor may start in either spin direction, and they don't necessarily have to start at the exact same time. Furthermore, direction of subsequent flywheel gyroscopic precession doesn't matter (it can go at least 45 degrees in either direction). Using a small servo motor or linear actuator along the rail system, flywheel location and rate of precession can be directly controlled. Therefore, gyroscopic force can be 'metered out' as the device tilts and falls, so that it does not suddenly 'give way'.
Why not just add more flywheels? Flywheel moment of inertia, and therefore gyroscopic torque, are proportional to the square of the flywheel radius. From a weight perspective, it is better to have fewer, larger flywheels rather than more numerous smaller flywheels. Size and geometry dictate maximal diameter and practicality of the flywheel arrangement. By building and testing different orientations, we have come to the conclusion that a vertical flywheel orientation is clearly optimal. The minimum, and therefore optimal, number of flywheels required is 2. We have several key design trade secrets for functionality.
Future design improvements for the counter-balancing walker include: adding wheels using super-capacitors for saving weight, using a capacitance switch at the handles (so that it only works if the handles are held); potentially adding straps or other safety features; and potentially adding a seat.
We fully understand that no single device can prevent all injuries from falls, however, we are excited about the potential of this unique device!
Dissatisfied by the suboptimal characteristics of commercially available electric motors, we have designed and built our own.
Why use a flywheel, when the motor itself can be a flywheel?
Why use bearings, when weight can be saved with graphite?
Designing and producing results is what we do! The path towards commercialization will require additional capital and regulatory approval.
Copyright © 2024 The GyroWalker - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy